Sorry for the long delay. Answers below:
On Apr 9, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Gareth wrote:
> I’ve created a community on blogging site
> livejournal.com, which is designed to act as a
> repository and forum for creative commons work. The
> community’s information is available here –
> We are using the Attribution 1 license -
> I’d be grateful if you answer two questions for me.
> 1. Is the it legally ok to use a creative commons
> license in the way this community does i.e.: Can a
> work be copyrighted under a creative commons license,
> merely by being posted (by the works original author)
> to a repository of creative commons work or is it
> absolutely necessary for the author of each work to
> individually license it?
yes, just be sure to alert your contributors, that a condition of
contribution is that they license their content.
> 2. Could you give us an idea of the sorts of ideas
> that can be copyrighted under a creative commons
> license, as opposed to those that require a patent or
> the as yet unavailable science commons license?
Copyrights cover texts, audio, video, etc. Patents cover inventions.
> Many thanks,
> Gareth Stack,
> genius_idea moderator